This week, I started imagining what graduate school would look like if we designed it as a networked knowledge space rather than just a sequence of courses, emails, meetings, and assignments. Graduate students learn a lot from formal coursework, but we also learn from side conversations, shared Google Docs, conference posts, group chats, advisor recommendations, and watching how more experienced scholars participate in academic spaces. Much of this learning is informal, but it is still important.
Instead of asking only whether graduate students should use LinkedIn, Reddit, blogs, Zotero, Google Docs, or annotation tools, we might ask what kinds of learning activities these tools support. Are students finding resources? Sharing opportunities? Asking questions? Collaborating on writing? Giving feedback? Making sense of confusing academic norms? These are networked knowledge activities because they involve knowledge moving through relationships, tools, and communities (Dennen et al., 2020).
This feels especially relevant to higher education because so much of graduate student learning depends on access to hidden knowledge. Students may need to learn how to prepare for conferences, email faculty, understand funding, find publishing opportunities, manage advisor relationships, or interpret academic expectations. These things are not always taught directly in class. Instead, students often learn them through networks. A student with a strong mentoring network may hear about opportunities earlier and understand academic norms more quickly. A student without that network may feel lost, even if they are academically capable.
This is where I imagine a “networked knowledge map” for graduate students. Instead of organizing resources only by topic, it could organize them by activity. One section could be “Ask,” where students post questions they are afraid to ask elsewhere. Another could be “Share,” where students post funding, conferences, and writing resources. Another could be “Reflect,” where students write short posts about what they are learning. Another could be “Connect,” where students find peers or mentors with similar research interests. This would not just be a database. It would be a living, social learning environment.
In summary, Week 6 helped me see that social media in higher education should not be about communication alone. It can also be about making hidden knowledge visible and building stronger learning networks. For graduate students, especially international students, first-generation students, and those still learning how academia works, this could make a meaningful difference.
References
Dennen, V. P. Networked Knowledge Activities. Excerpt from a manuscript in preparation.
Dennen, V. P., Word, K., Adolfson, D., Arechavaleta, V., He, D., Hsu, C.-W., Hur, J., Jung, D., Kent, H., Russell, A., & Toth, K. (2020). Using the networked knowledge activities framework to examine learning on social networking sitesLinks to an external site.. In P. Kommers & G. C. Peng (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Web-based Communities and Social Media 2020 (pp. 165-172). IADIS Press.
Love the idea of a networked knowledge map! As you state, it would make a meaningful difference to students finding themselves in the unfamiliar territory of grad school and/or finding needed assets and knowledge sources.
ReplyDeleteI love this idea! I also see this as the case for undergraduate students as they explore internships. However, as a graduate student, there were times I could have benefited from a knowledge map!
ReplyDelete