This week’s module helped me think more carefully about what it means to design networked learning activities. Last week, I started thinking about social media tools in terms of activities rather than platforms. This week pushed this idea further by asking how instructors can intentionally design those activities through learner analysis, tool selection, interaction requirements, learning materials, and facilitation.
One idea that stood out to me is that networked learning activities do not happen just because a tool is available. A class discussion board, shared document, or annotation tool can support learning, but only if the activity is designed with a clear purpose. This connects to Zgheib and Dabbagh’s (2020) discussion of social media learning activities. They emphasize that social media can support various learning activities, but that instructional design decisions matter. Instructors need to consider what learners are expected to do, how they will interact, and the learning outcomes the activity supports.
Learner analysis feels especially important for networked learning. Before asking students to participate online, instructors need to understand students’ access to technology, comfort with online sharing, privacy concerns, communication skills, and prior experience with the tools. Even if students use social media in their personal lives, that does not mean they automatically know how to use digital tools for academic learning. Gülbahar et al. (2017) also show that social media use in higher education requires thoughtful planning and support, not just adding tools into a course because they are popular.
Overall, this week’s readings helped me see that designing networked learning is more complicated than choosing a platform. The instructor has to make decisions about learners, tools, openness, interaction, facilitation, and assessment. A good networked learning activity should help students participate meaningfully, not just post something online. For me, this is an important reminder that technology integration is not about making learning look modern. It is about designing better opportunities for students to connect, create, and learn with others.
References
Gülbahar, Y., Rapp, C., Kilis, S., & Sitnikova, A. (2017). Enriching higher education with social media: Development and evaluation of a social media toolkitLinks to an external site.. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2656Links to an external site.
Zgheib, G. E., & Dabbagh, N. (2020). Social media learning activities (SMLA): Implications for designLinks to an external site.. Online Learning, 24(1), 50-66.
No comments:
Post a Comment